Warehouse AMR comparison: OTTO 1500 and MiR250
The current OTTO 1500 page lists a 1,900 kg payload despite the model name. MiR250 lists a 250 kg payload. Specifications need a source and measurement context.
Source checks: September 9, 2026 · AI-assisted review published by RoboFinders. No outside reviewer or endorsement is implied.
How we checked
Two manufacturer product pages checked September 9, 2026. Values are manufacturer claims, not independent test results. This is a two-product comparison, not a market-wide survey.
| Robot | Payload, speed and navigation | Integration, availability and price |
|---|---|---|
| OTTO 1500, source ↗ | 1,900 kg payload; maximum travel speed 2 m/s; 10-hour runtime from 90% to 10% charge. The page describes autonomous navigation with forward- and rear-facing cameras. | A contact path is published. Site-specific integration support, delivery lead time and a comparable installed price were not established by this review. |
| MiR250, source ↗ | 250 kg payload; maximum speed 2 m/s; 580 × 800 mm footprint and 300 mm height. The manufacturer describes obstacle avoidance in dynamic environments. | The source lists MiR Fleet compatibility, hook and shelf-carrier applications and optional top modules. Current stock, deployment cost and site integration require a supplier quote. |
Limits of this review
- Payload alone cannot establish throughput, suitability, safety or installed cost.
- Different runtime tests and duty cycles are not directly comparable.
Provider and manufacturer statements are paraphrased. Source links allow readers to check the original context. Availability and prices can change after the checked date.
Submit a correction · Directory methodology · Live data coverage